Document Details

Document Type : Article In Journal 
Document Title :
The Legal Aspects around Lockerbie Incident, Legal Study within?the?Principles of Public International Law
الجوانب القانونية حول حادث لوكربي دراسة قانونية وفقاً لمبادئ القانون الدولي العام
 
Subject : Systems 
Document Language : Arabic 
Abstract : Two aircrafts exploded in-flight, namely a US-registered aircraft, Pan Am, 103, over the Scottish town of Lockerbie on December 21, 1988, and a French-registered aircraft UTA 772 over Niger on September 19, 1989. The two explosions killed (440) persons. Investigators of the debris of the US-registered aircraft in Lockarbie found a few fragments of a bomb from these fragments, the U.K. and USA say that a twisting trail led to the Libyan Secret Services, so the two states issued arrest warrants for two persons alleged to be employees of the Libyan Secret Services. France also accused a group of Libyans of destroying the French-registered aircraft, demanding their extradition, the U.K. USA and France referred the matter to the Security Council which adopted Resolution 731 on January 21, 1992, Resolution 748, on March 31, 1992 and Resolution 883, on November 11, 1993, applying sanctions not involving the use of force under Chapter VII of the UN Charter against Libya. Libya on the other hand, instituting proceedings on March 3, 1992 against the U.K. and USA before the ICJ in respect of a dispute with the USA and the U.K. over the interpretation and application of the Montreal Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against the Safety of Civil Aviation 1971, the UN Secretary-General and the Arab league, Saudi Arabia and South Africa were also involved in attempt to find an amicable solution to the dispute. Consequently, Libya agreed for a trial under Scots Law before a Scottish Court sitting at Camp Zeist a military establishment near Utrecht, in Netherlands On August 27, 1998, the Security Council adopted Resolution 1192 endorsed the idea of a Scottish Trial in the Netherlands and the sanctions were suspended immediately, after the handover of the accused. The Scottish Court finds Mr. Abdul- Baset Ali Mohammed Al-Megrahi is guilt while Mr. Al-Amin Khalifa Fhimah is not guilt. Mr. Al-Megrahi requested the High Court for a sitting in an appellate capacity. If his appeal is not accepted or the court ratified the judgement of the court in Camp Zeist, then Libya will be responsible as a state then the U.K. and US will demand that Libya must pay appropriate compensation. 
ISSN : 1319-0997 
Journal Name : Economics and Administration Journal 
Volume : 17 
Issue Number : 1 
Publishing Year : 1424 AH
2003 AD
 
Article Type : Article 
Added Date : Sunday, October 11, 2009 

Researchers

Researcher Name (Arabic)Researcher Name (English)Researcher TypeDr GradeEmail
عمر أبو بكر باخشب OMAR A. BAKHASHABResearcher  

Files

File NameTypeDescription
 21820.pdf pdf 

Back To Researches Page